Physicochemical Properties and Sensory Evaluation of Sugar-Free Pumpkin Spread

Authors

  • Norshazila Shahidan Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, 71800, Bandar Baru Nilai, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia
  • Nursyazwani Azizi Haus Berhad, 2A, 2nd Floor, Jalan Karas, Kempas Lama, 81300 Johor, Malaysia
  • Wan Mohd Fadli Wan Mokhtar Faculty of Bioresources and Food Industry, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Besut Campus, 22200, Besut, Terengganu, Malaysia
  • Zarinah Zakaria Faculty of Bioresources and Food Industry, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Besut Campus, 22200, Besut, Terengganu, Malaysia
  • Nurul Zaizuliana Rois Anwar Faculty of Bioresources and Food Industry, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Besut Campus, 22200, Besut, Terengganu, Malaysia
  • Noor Yuslida Hazahari International Institute for Halal Research and Training (INHART), International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM), Level 3, KICT Building, Jalan Gombak, 53100, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Nasrul Fikry Che Pa Faculty of Engineering Technology, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Hab Pendidikan Tinggi Pagoh, KM 1, Jalan Panchor, 84600 Panchor, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47253/jtrss.v14i1.1649

Keywords:

fruit spread, physicochemical analysis, pumpkin, sensory evaluation, sugar-free

Abstract

Pumpkin (Cucurbita maxima spp.), a member of the gourd family Cucurbitaceae, is typically characterised by a hard orange rind with distinctive grooves. Pumpkin is a nutrient-dense fruit that offers numerous health benefits. However, studies on functional foods, such as sugar free pumpkin spread, remain limited in Malaysia. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the physicochemical properties and sensory evaluation of sugar free pumpkin spreads prepared with different sweeteners. Four formulations were developed i.e. pumpkin spread with sugar as a control (PSc), pumpkin spread with allulose sweetener (PSa), pumpkin spread with monk fruit sweetener (PSm) and pumpkin spread with stevia sweetener (PSs). Proximate analysis, total soluble solid, pH, texture and sensory analysis were conducted on all formulations. The results showed that PSa, PSm, and PSs had moisture contents of 27.72%, 27.34% and 26.13%, respectively, which were significantly lower than PSc (46.68%). For ash content, the highest value was recorded in PSs (6.53%), which also had the highest protein (6.57%) and fat content (4.76%). Meanwhile, the highest fibre content was found in PSm formulation (5.92%). However, the pH value for all samples showed no significant difference, ranging from 6.41 to 6.43. While the total soluble solid (TSS) showed a significant difference, PSc recording the highest TSS value (44.88 oBrix) compared to the other formulations. For sensory evaluation, the analysis found that the most preferred formulation was PSc, followed by PSa, PSm, and PSs. These findings demonstrated the potential of alternative sweeteners in developing sugar-free pumpkin spreads, offering a functional and healthier option with highly acceptable sensory attributes.

Downloads

Published

31-03-2026

How to Cite

Physicochemical Properties and Sensory Evaluation of Sugar-Free Pumpkin Spread . (2026). Journal of Tropical Resources and Sustainable Science (JTRSS), 14(1), 138-144. https://doi.org/10.47253/jtrss.v14i1.1649