A Systematic Review of Empty Pesticide Container (EPC) Practices and Associated Factor in Agriculture Sector

Authors

  • Hanania Mirza Mustafa Faculty of Forestry & Environmental, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Latifah Abd Manaf Faculty of Forestry & Environmental, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Abu Hanifah Mohammad Ramli Faculty of Forestry & Environmental, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47253/jtrss.v13i1.1259

Keywords:

pesticide packaging waste, agriculture waste, farmers, agriculture sector, environmental effect

Abstract

This systematic literature review explores the current state of empty pesticide container (EPC) disposal practices among farmers and the factors influencing these practices. The review identified 34 research articles and official reports that examined EPC disposal methods in the agricultural sector. The findings revealed that leaving empty containers at the farm and throwing them in irrigation canals were common disposal practices in several countries, posing environmental risks. Recycling and selling EPC were less prevalent, highlighting the need for improved infrastructure and awareness. Factors such as age, education, knowledge, training, facilities, and government regulations were found to influence farmers' disposal practices. The review underscores the importance of education, training, awareness campaigns, and supportive policies in promoting proper EPC disposal. Future research should address the identified limitations and explore the environmental and health impacts of different disposal methods in diverse contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Mustafa, H. M. ., Abd Manaf, . L. ., & Mohammad Ramli, . A. H. . (2025). A Systematic Review of Empty Pesticide Container (EPC) Practices and Associated Factor in Agriculture Sector . Journal of Tropical Resources and Sustainable Science (JTRSS), 13(1), 95–103. https://doi.org/10.47253/jtrss.v13i1.1259