Asymptomatic canine vector-borne diseases and diagnostic performance: Comparison between blood smears vs. conventional PCR

Authors

  • Tan Jun Jie Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan Pengkalan Chepa, 16100 Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia.
  • Ruhil Hayati Hamdan Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan Pengkalan Chepa, 16100 Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia.
  • Ibrahim Abdul-Azeez Okene Veterinary Medicine and Food Security Research Group, College of Health Sciences, Higher Colleges of Technology, Sharjah Men Campus, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
  • Nadiah Syuhada Roslan Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, 16310 Bachok, Kelantan, Malaysia.
  • Nur Atikah Hashim Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, 16310 Bachok, Kelantan, Malaysia.
  • Faqihah Ibrahim Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, 16310 Bachok, Kelantan, Malaysia.
  • C.W. Salma C.W. Zalati Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan Pengkalan Chepa, 16100 Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia.
  • Tan Li Peng Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan Pengkalan Chepa, 16100 Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47253/jtrss.v12i1.1360

Keywords:

asymptomatic, dogs, diagnostic methods, haemoparasites, Malaysia

Abstract

Across the globe, vector-borne diseases (VBD) are causes of health and economic concern, particularly for companion animals such as dogs and cats. The common clinical presentation ranges from subclinical to acute infection even a proportion with symptomatic manifestation. The diagnosis of asymptomatic animals with VBDs is quite challenging since veterinary practitioners do rely on presenting clinical signs to inform the choice of diagnostic plan. In Malaysia, blood smears (thin and thick) are employed in the diagnosis of VBDs such as babesiosis, anaplasmosis, theileriosis and trypanosomiasis. This method is readily available and inexpensive; however, the sensitivity and specificity are low as the diagnosis is strongly dependent on the experience of the examiner. Conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on the other hand is used in larger veterinary clinics and hospitals in Malaysia and is only utilised when there is a suspicion of VBDs. This study attempts to compare the thin blood smear method and conventional PCR in the diagnosis of of Anaplasma phagocytophilum, A. platys, Babesia canis, B. gibsoni, Ehrlichia canis in dogs in Malaysia. Thirty clinically healthy dogs (17 males and 13 females) averaging 2 years of age were randomly selected from clinic walk-ins to screen for VBDs with both blood smear and conventional PCR. In general, the conventional PCR was 2.5 times more sensitive and specific than the blood smear in the detection of VBDs including Babesia canis, Babesia gibsoni and Ehrlichia canis in the asymptomatic sampled dogs. The detection rate for blood smears was 20% (6/30) in comparison with 50% (15/30). Therefore, it is imperative to conduct screenings for VBDs in dogs, even when they present as asymptomatic, in order to avert the oversight of potential health emergencies. Conventional PCR emerges as the recommended methodology for screening asymptomatic dogs for VBDs.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-30

How to Cite

Jie, T. J., Hamdan, R. H. ., Okene, I. A.-A. ., Roslan, N. S. ., Hashim, N. A. ., Ibrahim, F. ., C.W. Zalati, C. S., & Peng, T. L. . (2024). Asymptomatic canine vector-borne diseases and diagnostic performance: Comparison between blood smears vs. conventional PCR. Journal of Tropical Resources and Sustainable Science (JTRSS), 12(1), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.47253/jtrss.v12i1.1360